🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are more and more allowing the far right to dictate the political agenda, according to a recent research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this phenomenon has unwittingly benefited far-right groups by legitimising their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Two Decades of Media Reporting

The findings, released in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an computerized content review of more than 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen German newspapers.

Capital-based researchers noted that as the far right moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to core themes like integration and migration, mainstream political groups increasingly adjusted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the dissemination of these ideas and signaled to the electorate that such stances were legitimate.

Implications for Democracy

"Public communication by mainstream parties is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a political sociologist involved in the study.

"This element has been overlooked," she added.

The effect was noticeable even when conventional parties were condemning the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is crucial."

Normalisation Phenomenon Across the Continent

While the study was centered around Germany, this normalisation effect is likely to affect nations throughout the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," said another co-author. "The far right says something and everybody begins discussing it for several days."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he stated.

Hardening of Political Discourse

At times, political figures have also toughened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recent discussion, a former national leader called for large-scale expulsions and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable instances can be observed across Europe, as politicians from nations ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the language of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an feedback loop that was unthinkable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are discussing cultural issues – migration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the radical right, that's the essence of narrative control," clarified a study author.

Some political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the hardline platform of the far right, despite research suggests that this approach drives the electorate to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Influence and Voter Awareness

The extent of data gathered revealed that the influence of radical groups had been gradual and had grown over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," stated a researcher. "However, when you encounter this negative framing around migration frequently, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for example, by mainstream parties, then of course this narrative gains more traction."

Requirement for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Own Discourses

The study highlighted the necessity for mainstream political parties to develop their distinct narratives, especially on subjects such as immigration and assimilation, instead of constantly trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."