🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an global treaty created to safeguard women from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked broad outcry both inside Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he has objections.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries